Why does the US hate digital trade?
Sam Lowe
31 October 2023
31 October 2023
Free trade agreements
Published 21 November 2023
Under this year’s APEC agenda, the US sought to emphasize its commitment to supply chain resilience, digital trade, and connectivity, but it has failed to deliver on key trade-related outcomes at the meeting’s conclusion. The Xi-Biden meeting may have brought some relief to APEC members, but the two superpowers continue to struggle with finding common grounds on numerous geopolitical flash points. Here are our five takeaways from the summit.
Leaders from the 21-member Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum gathered last week in San Francisco for the 30th APEC summit, where the spotlight was on a rare meeting between the US and Chinese presidents. The forum, chaired by the US, closed on Friday, with leaders issuing a statement titled the "Golden Gate Declaration." The 21 members of the Asia-Pacific group agreed to "harness" new technologies such as artificial intelligence, reached a general agreement to work toward a "clean and greener" economy, and committed to necessary reform of the World Trade Organization (WTO). However, the group struggled to arrive at a consensus regarding geopolitical events resulting in the issuing of a leader’s declaration and a chair’s statement as a compromise.
Dubbed "the center of the global economy" by US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, APEC accounts for 37% of the world's population and represents 62% of the global GDP, encompassing 47% of international trade. Traditionally trade-focused, APEC has expanded its cooperation to other areas such as human resources, marine conservation, and public health. Under this year’s APEC agenda “Creating a Resilient and Sustainable Future for All,” the United States sought to emphasize its commitment to supply chain resilience, digital trade, connectivity, and opportunities for small and medium enterprises but failed to deliver on key trade-related outcomes.
Here are five key takeaways from the summit:
IPEF falls well short of a traditional trade deal as it does not touch on tariffs or market access issues. However, it aims to set standards for business across some 40 percent of the global economy including three of the world’s top five economies — the United States, Japan, and India.
© The Hinrich Foundation. See our website Terms and conditions for our copyright and reprint policy. All statements of fact and the views, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
Message contents